Monday, 1 April 2019

Personalised Postcodes are now a Thing



Home owners now have the opportunity to personalise their postcodes, but at a cost; vanity doesn't come free.

Royal Mail has announced that from today it will take applications for personalised alphanumeric postcodes for an initial fee of £500 and an annual 'maintenance fee' of £200.

'We are delighted to announce this opportunity for people who own their own homes to choose a personalised postcode,' a Royal Mail spokeswoman said. 

'The postcodes could reflect a hobby or interest, a vocation, or some unique feature of their home or where they live,' she added. All applications would be vetted to ensure they don't breach standards of acceptability.

In an advance invitation to a select few privileged customers, Royal Mail has already approved the following vanity postcodes:

GR8 W8R - taken by a hospitality college
FI5 H1N - chosen by a keen angler
AV1 80R - bagged by a commercial airline pilot
K9S 4ME - selected by the owner of a dog kennels business

Existing postcodes can be dispensed with once the new one is approved. It does not need to begin with local postal area initials either, but will be unique to the single address of the applicant. The vanity postcodes will be able to be on-sold should the property change hands.

'As long as the postcode letters and numerals do not spell anything offensive or are likely to cause upset - and have not already been taken by someone else - we will approve them,' Royal Mail said. This rules out such personalised postcodes as B1G N0B, 4NI C8R, etc. 

But can you buy a vanity postcode as a gift for someone else? Yes, confirmed Royal Mail. So I'm going to, and soon - assuming it passes the decency test - you'll be able to write to:

Theresa May, 
10 Downing Street, 
London BO1 10X. 

Can't see how that would offend anyone.

- Press Association, 01 April, 2019




Friday, 15 March 2019

Lost Innocence

I woke up this morning expecting to see the usual news coverage of that omnishambles called Brexit. I was ready to quickly swipe to my daily dose of Dilbert, and then browse what Elon Musk's SpaceX had been up to on space.com. I didn't, because I couldn't. Instead, I saw news stories about a massacre in New Zealand, the country I'd called home for over forty years. Forty-nine people had been gunned down and killed in two mosques in Christchurch, with at least twenty more injured. My morning, and my whole basis of knowing New Zealand had suddenly been turned upside down.

I went out there as an almost-fifteen year old and discovered a country of gentleness, of times past. A country that some said was 'stuck in the 1950s'. I loved it from the start.

Not long after joining high school, in the sleepy town of New Plymouth, a boy asked me one day, 'Do you like Maoris?' His name was Mark. I didn't understand his question, but it turned out that even in this provincial high school in 1969 there were tensions based on race. I, however, didn't see them, and apart from Mark's query saw no other real evidence of segregation or unease. Our class was made up of Kiwis, Fijians, boys of Polish and Dutch extraction, and probably many more. We had city kids and country kids, wealthy and not-so.The point is we gelled.

As the years went by I did however witness some divisions within New Zealand. I'm not sure when it started - perhaps in the very early 1970s when there was an imminent danger that some of us boys would be drafted into the military and sent to fight in Vietnam (I confess now to seceretly abusing my trusted position as a part-time office worker at the YMCA to use their Gestetner copier to churn out  protest leaflets against Agent Orange and defoliation). Maybe it was with the protests against the visit of the nuclear-powered (and armed?) USS Truxtun in 1976, and later the civil unrest around the Springbok rugby tour in 1981. Suddenly New Zealand seemed uneasy with, and within, itself.

As the years went by there were other visible abrasions, not least of which would be the accusations (and reparations and acknowledgements) around colonialism, and Britain's mis-handling of the Treaty of Waitangi - but I don't recall there ever being any religious-based unease. Migration to New Zealand was an accepted fact and had been for decades; the country needed skilled labour in a number of areas and opened its arms to those qualified. Earlier it simply opened its arms to anyone anyway - witness the '£10-pound-Pom' scheme of the 1950s and '60s. New Zealand welcomed everyone and anyone.

The country has tussled many times over the years with its identity in a global context - and within itself often too - but by-and-large has always managed to self-level and maintain dignity and calm. Yes there have been the odd spikes in extremism as there are in any nation, but overall, well: good on ya' Aotearoa.

But this morning all that changed. This morning New Zealand wasn't in the global media for its tourism delights, its Lord of the Rings scenery, its earthquakes or its beached pilot wales. This morning its All Blacks and Silver Ferns took a back seat. This morning New Zealand was covered in blood, and would never be the same again.

One of my immediate thoughts was, New Zealand has lost its innocence. Its deputy prime minister echoed my thoughts a little later, and he - we're - right. What had generally been perceived as a safe, clean, green country full of friendly people, thousands of miles away from the rest of the world's troubles, was destroyed when - at time of writing - one man allegedly took it upon himself to drive to two mosques during prayer time and murder almost fifty innocent people. It may eventuate that more perpetrators were involved, or that a terrorist organisation was behind the atrocities, but that will become evident in time.

The tendency at this point is for the media - and the rest of us - to want answers immediately. Did the security services know of the threat? Did they do all they could to prevent it? If not why not? Who let this shooter, this extremist, into the country? How was he (and perhaps his accomplices) able to get weapons? At this stage we have nothing but questions, and in the absence of answers we do, of course, leap to conclusions. It's in our nature to fill the gaps with opinions, thoughts, ideas, suspicions.

Hard though it might be, we need now to wait for the due process to take place. A man is in custody, along - at this point - with at least two others. The police have a long road of investigation ahead of them, as do the security intelligence services, not just in New Zealand, but Australia and likely further afield. CCTV footage will be revealed eventually, showing the suspect(s) preparing for the atrocity. Acquaintances will be interviewed, 'experts' will be questioned, and slowly over the next few weeks we will begin to learn the truth.

In the meantime we can do little but grieve. Nobody saw this coming, but New Zealand must always have been a 'soft target', and it now must up its game to ensure nothing like this ever happens again. Sadly many people will now consider cancelling their planned holidays there; Kiwi tourism will take a dive, and the country's reputation as a safe place to go has been irrevocably tarnished. It will, however, recover. But right now that's nothing compared to the grief of those family members whose loved ones were killed in this massacre. Some of those people went to New Zealand seeking a haven, a place of sanctuary from the troubles of their own countries. They went there seeking the country that I arrived in fifty years ago. Instead, terrorism followed them there.

It's evident from the social media postings today that any divisions within Kiwi society are being put aside. Today, New Zealand is united in its grief; and united in its resolve that it will never be such an easy target again. Kia Kaha, Aotearoa (Stay strong, New Zealand).

Thursday, 3 January 2019

The Leaving of Liverpool


Lime Street Station, Liverpool, 03 Jan. 1969
The slightly fuzzy photo shows me standing in the doorway of a train at Liverpool’s Lime Street Station. It is the third of January 1969. I have my eyes closed, but I’m smiling. Poetically you could say I am dreaming of my new life in New Zealand, which is where my Mum and I are headed on this distant day, but in reality I am caught mid-blink. Which is a shame because the photo represents a significant moment in my life.
 
In the picture I am fourteen-and-a-half. At that age it was still important to me to count in half-years because it made me sound closer to fifteen. I don’t do it any more – telling anyone who’ll listen that I’m sixty-four-and-a-half is futile, and anyway I’d rather be closer to sixty three. Or twenty three come to that.

People today still ask, why did you go to New Zealand? Sometimes I ask myself the same question, but only when I stand back to observe my life’s choices dispassionately. Was it the right thing to do? Certainly. Could I have stayed in the UK? Yes to that too, but such speculation is a waste of time, and I might not have much of that left; Facebook adverts keep reminding me to pre-plan my funeral. Maybe they know something I don’t.

So, how did we come to emigrate? Blame me, it was my decision. It’s a long story, but after losing one husband to sudden death and a second to divorce, my mother had devoted her life to bringing me up, while also looking after my ailing alcoholic granny and holding down a job with HM Customs in Liverpool. She deserved a medal, but somehow the honours list always overlooked her.

Anyway, after a long illness my granny died in 1967. It was, it has to be said, a relief for both of us. Suddenly my mother had some freedom, which was seized upon by a once-spurned suitor of hers who had earlier left the UK to live in New Zealand. His name was John, and he was an outdoors hunting, shooting, fishing type. He had kept in touch with Mum by correspondence (aerogrammes, remember them?), in which he’d occasionally renewed his offer of marriage, but which she’d always – of necessity – turned down. There was no way my grandmother was going to survive the trip to New Zealand, and anyway, I was still at school.

The mountain formerly known as Egmont
But with no elderly invalid to care for any more, my Mum received yet another marriage proposal and saw it perhaps as a ‘final demand’. This was some time in 1968. One morning – a Saturday if I remember rightly – she came into my bedroom where I was languishing in teenage torpor (it was probably actually 3pm) and said, ‘How would you like to go to New Zealand?’

That was the gist of it anyway. She went on to explain about John, this former shipping clerk who had taken a shine to her seventeen years previously in Liverpool, whom she had spurned. He had gone to New Zealand and joined the forestry service, then later the NZ police force. He was now a sergeant and based in some place called New Plymouth, a coastal town dominated by what was then called Mount Egmont, a dormant volcano slightly smaller but of Mount Fuji-like proportions. Today it is called Mount Taranaki and wears a more indigenous cloak of respectability, but that’s another story.

I digress. There was no pressure from my mother to make a decision. She laid out the proposal and left me to think about it, but one thing she made very clear: it would be my decision. If I wanted to go we’d go, and if I didn’t we’d stay. This was a big choice for a fourteen (and-a-half) year-old, and I look back on it as a momentous occasion. Our whole future was put in my hands. It was the biggest decision of my life. I was – and still am – proud that I was given such a big say in our lives, possibly the biggest.

The clock's ticking: decision time
You’ll be thinking right now that Mum was a liberal, far-seeing soul who was way ahead of her time, and you might be right. The reality is that I was at high school, and for the first time in my scholarly life I was actually starting to do quite well. Not brilliantly, but I was finally making progress  (my reports had typically said things like, ‘Could try harder’, and ‘Michael finds this subject difficult’) and after some dismal years I was enjoying myself at school, and had made some great friends. My future was looking bright, so what would happen if I suddenly threw all that away and moved 12,000 miles to a new life?

I did research. I studied anything I could find about New Zealand, which wasn’t much. There was no Internet, so I was restricted to whatever was in the library, which largely meant geography books in which New Zealand was always accorded a frustratingly small section. Mum told me of some of John’s hunting and fishing exploits, which sounded appealing; even at that age I was keen on rambling, and my friends and I would catch buses to the countryside and walk across farmland using old outdated guide books. I was also interested in fishing (though in the absence of a father could never master the cast – Mum didn’t know how), and I liked golf – in short, I realised that I too was actually ‘outdoorsy’. 

The Southern sky was a drawcard
Another plus – and this was a major one – was that I had an all-consuming passion for astronomy, and owned a nice 4 1/2-inch telescope (as with my age the half-inch was very important), so the prospect of the southern hemisphere night sky with more stars and a lot less light pollution was a major attraction.

And that was it. Decision made: we’d go. If I gave any thought to leaving behind my close-knit friends and my increasing popularity at school (at last) I sadly don’t recall. Maybe having made the choice to leave I just began looking forward, although I knew I would miss my girlfriend, Janet. She was a real girlfriend too, and I’d only just got to ‘first base’ with her (I’ll leave you to guess what that was because the ‘Base Scale’ varies globally and has not yet been formalised by any authority), so I promised her I’d be back within three years, at least for a visit. Meanwhile we would keep in touch. (We sort-of did, but with return aerogramme correspondence taking at least six weeks this wasn’t easy. I did go back for a few months three years later, but the flame had died. And anyway, I’d already got way past second base in NZ).

The SS Canberra, P&O Line
And so, some months later after much planning, organising, packing, and selling our tiny 17th century cottage, Mum and I found ourselves at Liverpool’s Lime Street Station boarding the train for London and on to Southampton, from where the next day we would sail away on the SS Canberra, the cliffs of England slowly disappearing in the grey, murky January afternoon.

While I know the names of everyone in the photo on the platform I can’t recall who took the picture. Whoever it was caught me with my eyes shut momentarily, which is poignant really because the fifty years since then have disappeared - in the blink of an eye.

(Mike Bodnar has now returned from New Zealand and lives in Surrey)