Mike Bodnar hops into bed with authors who've struggled with sex scenes...
![]() |
| Lust in the lab, courtesy of AI |
Some readers were diametrically opposed in their opinions on plot, characters, and so on, while some were in general agreement. Where there was consensus, I had a clear steer on what needed attention, but where reviewers disagreed, I had to make my own call.
That’s okay, I’ve coped with it and have completed draft number two (read: seven). But one comment in the feedback threw me for a while, and that was about sex. Or, in this case, the lack of it.
Just as an aide-mémoire, the novel is called Settlement, and is a split-timeline story, flip-flopping between 1839 New Zealand and present-day England. In the New Zealand part of the narrative I have two key characters, Lucien and Kitty, who become ‘partners’ in Lucien’s secretive mission, but they soon also become romantically involved with each other. So far, so steamy.
I thought I’d hinted sufficiently that they'd probably had sex - where in a makeshift laboratory Kitty suggests they ‘make magic’ - but apparently that wasn’t enough, and the reader’s imagination failed to fill the gap.
So I sat down at the keyboard, tried to get into ‘the zone,’ and… froze. Complete impotence. Just couldn’t perform. Why? Because there’s an award for bad sex writing, and I didn’t want to win it.
![]() |
| Hopefully not a contender... |
It’s called The Bad Sex in Fiction Award, and is an annual British literary prize awarded by the Literary Review magazine. It is, as you might guess, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, and aims to mock the year's most awkward, embarrassing, or mortifying sexual description in novels.
Here’s an example, from a novel called Pax by John Harvey (a joint winner one particular year):
She was burning hot and the heat was in him. He looked down on her perfect black slenderness. Her eyes were ravenous. Like his own they were fire and desire. More than torrid, more than tropical: they two were riding the Equator. They embraced as if with violent holding they could weld the two of them one.
And here’s a runner-up, an excerpt from The River Capture by Mary Costello:
He clung to her, crying, and then made love to her and went far inside her and she begged him to go deeper and, no longer afraid of injuring her, he went deep in mind and body, among crowded organ cavities, past the contours of her lungs and liver, and, shimmying past her heart, he felt her perfection
I’m not here to pass judgement on these literary indiscretions; all I’m saying is I didn’t want to be accused of writing a bad sex scene. So, how could I give myself some, er, protection?
A Bit of Slap and Tickle
By way of explanation, a ‘bit of slap and
tickle’ is a somewhat risqué British phrase that refers obliquely to the act of
sex, or at least some sort of naughtiness. And obliqueness (obliquety?) was
what I needed.
I absolutely did not want to write a word-for-word, pant-for-pant or gasp-for-gasp sex scene. Bodice-ripping and heaving bosoms were out of the question. I wanted to hint, refer, suggest - all those things we do when we’re flirting, for example - rather than coming right out with saying “Fancy sex?”
![]() |
| Read into this what you will, and blame AI |
In the darkness she said, “So, Lucien. Shall we make magic?”
They did, but it did not immediately involve iodine, or bromine; the chemistry that came into play at that moment was purely biological, an overwhelming concoction of craving, passion, lust. In the pitch black, their hearts took over, their lips found each other; whispers, fumblings, urges – all competed for dominance in the dark, and triumphed completely and utterly over rational thought. The only chemistry at that moment was that generated by their own desires.
“I want you, Lucien. I’ve wanted you for the entirety of the voyage here” whispered Kitty hoarsely.
“You have me, my love. You have me…”
Eew. I’m actually cringing at it even now, and I’m not convinced at all that it’s what’s required. I'm not sure it really works, as the actress said to the bishop. But, surely it leaves nothing to the imagination.
Post-coitus
I’m exhausted. I heave myself off the
subject and collapse in a sweaty heap beside my keyboard, reaching blindly for
a cigarette. Only problem is, I don’t smoke.
I will almost certainly rewrite that scene. Twice, three times. I’ll be a machine, unstoppable, insatiable. Because I absolutely do not want to get into bed with the Bad Sex in Fiction Award judges.
Maybe I just need to practice more.



Haha, Mike. Tricky prose, indeed. I think you should go all in. No beating about the bush. Make it as explicit as you can and see what your beta readers say. They certainly can't accuse you of being a pussy.
ReplyDelete